Los Angeles Courts Grant Two Petitions

Source: ACSOL

Two superior courts in Los Angeles county have granted petitions submitted on behalf of two different registrants.  The first petition was granted on Nov. 5 in the San Fernando Valley court house to a registrant convicted of Penal Code section 243.4 whose tier had not yet been determined.  This registrant was represented by ACSOL President Chance Oberstein.

The second petition was granted today in the downtown Los Angeles courthouse to a registrant convicted of Penal Code section 288(a) and assigned to Tier 2.  This registrant was represented by ACSOL Executive Director Janice Bellucci.  In both cases, the District Attorney did not object to the petitions.

In addition to the petitions granted in Los Angeles county, it is reported that 22 petitions have been granted thus far in San Diego county.  That total includes petitions submitted by the public defenders office on behalf of registrants convicted of Penal Code section 288(a).  

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

41 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Nice. Congratulations to all!

Congratulations! Thank you team ACSOL!

Congrats to ALL!

The momentum is building!

Once tens of thousands of registrants are released from the tyranny of the registry and the public sees that there is NOT a huge wave of sex crimes, then there will be hope to change the registry to start allowing us level 3’s off.

What was the basis for the appeal for the 288(a) as that was an attempt (664) and working with LA Public Defender and would like to make a move from Tier 2 to Tier 1 and with a COR I would be able to now get off the Registry

Just out of curiosity, are Chance and Janice donating their time for these petitions????

Man this is crazy, these usually hands on 288(a)s (which includes children of all ages under 14) are getting off the registry when the 664/288(a) with the added 288.2 simply for talking to them online about meeting in person are not.
Unbelievable.

Thanks for all you do I’m hopeful one day Virginia will have some positive news. I’m so happy for everyone who is free.

its sad though that people in CA that have a pc311 are LIFERS ;(

Congratulations to these two that Petition for removal and was granted. Great work and time from Attorneys Chance Oberstein and Janice Bellucci. Excellent Attorneys who get great results. Also, I would like to hear if any Petitions for removal have been granted from San Bernardino County and if they were TBD. Anyone have difficulty with this County?

I petitioned July 31st for relief of registration, it’s been over 4 months now, im wondering is this normal? is there a way to check on my status? the courts sent me to the counties public defenders office in which I handed my relief forms? even if I had to pay an attorney *I would * atleast I would know something & with updates, and all honesty, it would be worth every single cent *GOOD LUCK TO ALL*

I just donated $100.00

Im in San Diego and was assigned to Tier 3. My charges are 288(a) and 288.2(b). My attorney had determined I should be in Tier 2 and qualify for 10 year exception.

I don’t know why I’m in Tier 3. It seems the DOJ can just place anyone in any tier regardless of charges?

I see 288.2 is in Tier 3 but why would 288(a) be in Tier 2 when it’s a worse offense? These laws make no sense.

GS, my petition proceedings were at the San Fernando Court House. I’ve been to VN Court house on other matters and I could b wrong but I’ll give it jab. I’m assuming theyre requiring a stamp from the clerk that’s on the second floor, criminal line. Thats we’re alll cases are filled. Once it’s filled they will contact your attorney with a court date and court room #. I hope this helps